Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Minecraft Critical Thinking Task (Session 2)


Goal: To complete set up for Minecraft critical thinking task

Attendance: Lee Martin, Rob Dunlop

Overview:

- Reviewed additions made to procedures and guided questions.

- Solidified links to social studies curriculum (A. 2.3, A.3.4) and math curriculum. Confident that they are aligned effectively to culminating task.
 
Social Studies
         A2.3 analyse and construct maps as part of their investigations into interactions among and between First Nations and Europeans (e.g., thematic maps showing physical features that influenced settlement patterns, agricultural practices, or the habitat of animals that sustained the fur trade; historical maps that show First Nations territory at the time of contact or the expansion of New France
         A3.4 identify significant offices and institutions in New France (e.g., the seigneurial system; the Roman Catholic Church; the king, governor, bishop, and intendant; nuns, priests, missionaries), and describe their importance to settlers in New France “What effect did the seigneurial system have on the way land was divided and developed?”
Mathematics
        determine, through investigation using a variety of tools (e.g., concrete materials, dynamic geometry software, grid paper) and strategies (e.g., building arrays), the relationships between the length and width of a rectangle and its area and perimeter, and generalize to develop the formulas [i.e., Area = length x width; Perimeter = (2 x length) + (2 x width)];
        solve problems requiring the estimation and calculation of perimeters and areas of rectangles
        determine, through investigation, the relationship between capacity (i.e., the amount a container can hold) and volume (i.e., the amount of space taken up by an object), by comparing the volume of an object with the amount of liquid it can
        contain determine, through investigation using stacked congruent rectangular layers of concrete materials, the relationship between the height, the area of the base, and the volume of a rectangular prism, and generalize to develop the formula (i.e., Volume = area of base x height)

- Lee addressed concerns about giving students more guided practice.

- Decide to create a lead up assignment to give students practice, to work out any issues and to help build success criteria off of.

- After brainstorming, we decided to have student “Design Mr. Martin's Backyard”.

- We discussed our pedagogical approach to this assignment and agreed we would keep it very similar to culminating task. However, we would give less details as this assignment would become the basis of teaching perimeter, area and volume/capacity.

- Decided that we needed to extend the culminating task to include volume and capacity.

- Create the investigation for the “backyard planning”

- Developed and tweaked learning goal. Also, made predictions to what students would be able to come up with as success criteria.
 
Learning goal: To effectively demonstrate an understanding of perimeter, area and volume of
                          rectangles and cubes using Minecraft.
Unpack
- Proper Units
- Correct Forumlas
- Clear communication of math
- Variety of dimensions
- Guide Questions (Relationships)
- Accuracy
- Labels

- Decided that this would be tweaked more after the first assignment and that we would wait to make rubric to make it more authentic to the students with regards to their wording and ideas.

Next Steps:

- To get MinecraftEDU installed in the lab (waiting on a response)

- Lee to create graphic organizers for both investigations

- Set up 'World' in Minecraft MOD

MinecraftEDU


Goal: To create a critical challenge using Minecraft to teach measurement expectations

Attendance: Lee Martin, Rob Dunlop, Brad Mayhew

Overview:

- Lee justified the significance of using Minecraft in the classroom. Showed an online example that motivated him to undertake this initiative.



- Lee explained the set up for MindcraftEDU and the development of 'Mods'.

- Through discussion, we decided we wanted to create a cross curricular (math/social science) critical thinking task. We decided to create the seigneurial system in New France as an extension to the material being covered in social science.

- To get a better understanding of Minecraft, a grade 5 students came to answer several questions and demonstrate some of the tools used in the program.

- Based on what we learned from the student, we decided that we would focus on the measurement unit. In particular, investigations involving perimeter and area of rectangles and squares.

- We discussed the pedagogical approach we wanted to use. We decided to use the scientific investigation approach for our culminating assignment.

- We developed the purpose and materials and worked on developing the procedures.  As well, we started to explore different guided questions.
 
-  Click here to see the rough draft for the scientific investigation.
 
 
 
Next steps:
-  to further develop the investigation, create our learning goals and success criteria and to discuss how we would set up this culminating task

Sunday, November 24, 2013

Science Report Success Criteria (8FI)

Goal:  To transfer success criteria to anchor chart and rubric

Attendance:  Jack, Rob

-  Discussed co-construction of success criteria
-  Discussed the important of placement in room and the fact that it is a 'live' document, that needs to
   change as labs evolve.
-  Looked a different ways to layout the anchor chart
-  Jack had a creative idea for design
-  Decided to make the first anchor chart in English and then transfer to French one the students fully understand the criteria
-  Created the anchor chart (rough copy), Jack wants to create a final good copy.


-  Then worked on transferring success criteria to rubric
-  Discussed checklist as a method to help with feedback
-  Discussed how each lab needs to link to curriculum and that is what they are being assessed on.
-  Finished Rubric (below)


https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B1QTCzUprTwIR0lHVnpkT256QWc/edit

-  Discussed how to model use of success criteria in large group and small group instruction

Next Steps:
-  He will model how to write up a lab using success criteria
-  He will have students use this lab to peer assess other groups work
-  We will meet up to discuss how this went and refine if necessary

Co-Teach Success Criteria (8FI)

Focus:  To co-create success criteria for science lab report through co-teaching 

Attendance:  Jack, Rob, Brad Mario

-  Opened class discussing the purpose of working together to create this criteria
-  Showed a video to engage students in the lesson.  See video below.


-  Related the video to making observations and tied that into how that relates to a science lab.
-  Pulled out different components of a science lab (purpose, hypothesis, materials, procedure, observations, results, conclusion).
-  Asked students to put on their 'teacher hats' and determine which of the above they felt would be the best to assess to demonstrate understanding of the concepts being investigated. 
-  Student selected Observations, Results and Conclusion, which aligned perfectly with projected learning goal.
-  Posted Learning Goal:  To effectively use scientific observations, during an experiment, to analyze results and develop a strong conclusion.
- Through looking at examples and discussion about previous two labs, we co-constructed the success criteria.  We focused on observations, results and conclusion.
-  At the end, we came up with 3 success criteria, unpacked on the Smartboard.


Next Steps:
-  Transfer success criteria from Smart Notebook to chart paper (anchor chart)
-  Create a rubric using the success criteria
-  Model use of success criteria in a lab


Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Science (Grade 8 PI)

Focus-  Incorporating Learning Goals and Success Criteria in science

Attendance:  Jack and Rob

Overview:

  • Met with high school science teacher to discuss current expectations and format for lab reports.
  • They do not do formal reports, however they have student focus on observations, results and conclusions.
  • Helped us get a clearer understanding of these three elements of a report and gave example of what they are looking for and how they assess it.
  • Also, talked about the rationale behind this.  Focus more on the skill of analysing the data and application of information.
  • Revisited our past learning goal and success criteria and realized that it needed to be changed based on new information and understanding.  Discussed how this need to be a live document that changes as more information is presented. 
  • Decided that we should reword our learning goal to include observations, results and conclusions.
  • Decided to backward design our success criteria based on what it is we expect to see.  
  • Discussed the different between observations and results and developed specific success criteria and requirements for each.
  • As well, looked a example of good results and selected the aspects that we thought we important and added them to our success criteria and learning goals.
  • Once happy with this, we solidified our choice of labs and agreed to co-teach next day 3 to two different classes and then debrief afterwards.  
  • He wanted to know how this could fit into math as well.  We discussed creating learning goals and success criteria for communication of mathematical ideas and for problem solving.

Next Step:  
  • Jack will administer lab diagnostic prior to day 3
  • We will look at this together to see how it fits with our success criteria and potentially make adjustments
  • Co-teach lesson on developing success criteria with the students 
  • Create an anchor chart with examples that can be used to reference for other labs throughout this unit and others.

Learning Goals and Success Criteria Brainstorm

Monday, November 4, 2013

Science (Grade 8 FI)

Focus:  Incorporating Learning Goals and Success Criteria into the Science Curriculum

Attendance:  Jack, Rob

Overview

  • Decided we wanted to meaningfully connect learning goals and success criteria into science lessons
  • Discussed current unit (Substances) and where he was at in this unit.
  • Cross referenced material he was using with curriculum to see where we should go next
  • Decided it would be helpful to have Success Criteria for lab write ups.
  • Wanted to ensure consistency with high school
  • Contacted Anthony Siriani at AN Myer to create high school liaison
  • Discussed how it would be important to separate success criteria from requirements, especially in lab reports
  • Anthony return call and filled us in on how it looks in high school.  Main focus on Observations and Conclusion.  Moved away from formal lab report write ups.
  • With this information, decided that this would be our focus as well.  We wanted to create success criteria for just the observations and the conclusions.
  • Consulted Smarter Science Resource for ideas.
  • Developed a learning goal:  To effectively use observations to support or reject hypothesis into a strong conclusion.  
  • Brainstormed what a good observation should look like using example reports (ie.  Different ways of presenting data, accuracy, and detail)
  • Brainstormed what a strong conclusion looks like (present most important information, clear explanation, relate to why this is important).
  • Pulled apart requirements for each.  
  • Discussed how we plan to teach this.  Decided to give them a lab to do with minimal guidance as a diagnostic.  Use these reports (chart paper), to help pull out some of the success criteria and guide them towards creating stronger observations and conclusions.  Have then revisit their lab using the success criteria and use feedback to improve it.  Then do another lab that will allow them to practice this again.  We were thinking for using an online lab to have students do this independently. 
Next Steps:
  • To connect with high school teacher on Wednesday to get a clearer picture of what this looks like in high school
  • Select a lab to complete as a diagnostic and one to complete as a practice.

Rough Draft
Grade Eight Science
Lab Assessment

Learning Goal: To effectively use scientific observations, during an experiment, to develop a strong
conclusion.

Observations:
Success Criteria: Able to select the most appropriate way of displaying data recorded
Able to accurately collect and record data
Able to make specific and detailed observations throughout lab
Requirements: Must present all finding from experiment
Must carefully following the procedures in order

Conclusions:
Success Criteria: Able to clearly explain understanding of the main findings of the lab
Able to pull out the most important findings from the lab
Able to relate importance of the finding to real world situations

Requirements: Must accept/refute hypothesis
Must create a summary of findings
Must answer guided Questions


Thursday, October 24, 2013

Grade 7 (French Immersion) Updated inquiry frameword

Overall Arching Inquiry Question
Who should we help?  Equitable distribution.

Overarching Critical Challenge:
The UN has created a sustainability fund for a Natural Resources Issue. Create a Proposal and a sustainable action plan.
 
INQUIRY SUB TASKS
 
Background Knowledge  (Hook:  Enbridge Article)
 - Natural Resources (B3. Definition, sustainable: first part of definition)
- Natural Resources Issues (definition- examples)
- Factors <---------------------------------------------> Natural Resources
                              Impact and significance
-  Who is involved?  Who's affected? Who benefits?  Pro/cons purpose?
  • Political, Social, Economic, Geographic (environmental)
 Application:    (Japan Article)
Develop a list of natural resources (Canada and the World)
- News articles, pictures, videos: Identify the issues and the factors
                -  highlight impact in four factors, transfer to four square)
-  Connect to Criteria (Magnitude, Scope, Duration)
-  Questions-  Why does this matter?  Who Cares?
- The rank (good, better, best)

Not sustainable                                                                      Sustainable
                                          Continuum
       I--------------------------------------------------------------------------I

  • how many, how much, depth, gravity, longevity, area,
  • in end plot on the line (social, economic, political, geographic)

Inquiry
      -  mini-lessons  (paraphrasing, evaluating sources, mapping analysis, etc...)
      -  Teaching Critical Thinking
      -  Process of Inquiry
      -  Action Plan
     
 

Grade 7 (FI)


TFL- October 23rd, 2013

In attendance: Melissa, Brad, Mario, Danny, Kevin, Stephen, Rob

Objective: Completion of Critical Inquiry Framework

- Review of what we discussed last session.
- Looked at TC2 lesson “Consider Significance” to help with criteria for Impact (discussed in
   previous session)
- Discussed having the three criteria (magnitude, scope of impact, duration) into all four areas
  (social, political, economic, geographic)
- Discussed the definition of sustainability- tried to determine if we should add in equity into the
   definition.
- Presented specific natural resources issues around the world.
- Stephen shared Fishing in Japan, Forest fire in Montreal
- Brad shared oil sands development in Alberta
- Rob shared forestry issues in Brazil, UN sustainability document
- Danny discussed giving the Aboriginal Perspective and how to create a reasonable
   sustainability plan.
- Kevin shared Embridge Oil pipeline affected rivers (aboriginal perspective),
- Melissa shared Yanomami (sample from curriculum). Presented from TC2 source docs

- Decided to use Enbridge Idea (local) to model Background knowledge
- Decided to use larger Issue (Japan: Nuclear affect on fishing) to get students to apply their
  learning
- Worked on connecting four factors to criteria using Japan as an example.
- Focus question to pull out criteria - Why does this event matter? Who cares?
- Discussed time line- Around 3rd week of November
- Also, discussed type of teaching (team, independent, Co-teaching)
- Tools for Thought introduced – Thinking Strategies.

Inquiry
- Mini- Lessons
- Teaching Critical Thinking
- Action Plan

- Discussed the importance of mini lesson throughout the inquiry part. Avoid just letting them go.

Next Steps:
Grade seven team will start unit mid-November and work on background knowledge.
At that point they will decide if we need to meet and readjust or if they will just
continue through application phase. We will need to meet to go through the Inquiry
and action plan phase.

Here is the Delicious Bookmarking site that we talked about starting.

 
 

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Grade Seven (FI)

  • started looking at progress on critical challenge diagnostic
  • going to add into science and geography lessons, upcoming novel study
  • work still to be assessed
  • Discussed overarching tasks and critical inquiry question
  • Discussion on whether to limit their choice of location and issue
  • Looked at skills we wanted students to develop in order to help us decide if we want to limit topic choice.
  • Discussed goals for this overall session: To be able of transfer this framework to other units and curriculum
-  Developed framing below.
 
 
 
Overarching Critical Challenge:
The UN has created a sustainability fund for a Natural Resources Issue. Create a Proposal and a sustainable action plan.
 
INQUIRY SUB TASKS
 
Background Knowledge
 - Natural Resources (B3. Definition, sustainable)
- Natural Resources Issues (definition- examples)
- Factors <---------------------------------------------> Natural Resources
                              Impact and significance
  • Political, Social, Economic, Geographic (environmental)
 Application:   

Develop a list of natural resources (Canada and the World)
- News articles, pictures, videos: Identify the issues and the factors
- Significance of sustainability
- The rank (good, better, best)

Not sustainable                                                                      Sustainable
                                          Continuum
- I--------------------------------------------------------------------------I

  • how many, how much, depth, gravity, longevity, area,
  • in end plot on the line (social, economic, political, geographic)
Next Steps:
-  Bring in specific examples of locations that are struggling with sustaining a natural resources
-  Think about what strategies we will focus on teaching in the final stage of the inquiry
-  Finish creating the framework so that it is ready to be implemented into the classroom

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Focus- Integrating Critical Inquiry Throughout the Curriculum (Specifically Geography)

Attendance- Kevin, Stephen, Melissa, Mario, Brad, Rob

Overview

  • Started the session discussing and trying to refine "If then" statement
  • Looked at diagnostic (Explain the Image) as a group to see where they were strong and where they needed more support.
  • Overall findings, were that students were usually making inferences first, then trying to support with observations.  Several groups still mixing up the two concepts. 
  • We agreed that it would be good to have a follow up lesson where we just focused on Observations.  From there, they could build upon at and add in the inferences.  As well, we felt that they would need  more work on how to pull both of them together into an effective summary.
  • At this point, we decided to determine where we should go based on what we observed during the lesson and in the activity.
  • We agreed that we needed more clarification on the difference between critical literacy, inquiry and thinking.  We decided that this would be a good time to share our definitions based on the article, Exploring Inquiry.  We agreed that inquiry in more of a framework with an overarching question that drives the instruction.  As well, we discussed that their is a main inquiry task that students are working towards.  We also discussed that there needs to be a variety of smaller inquiries that lead them to developing the knowledge and skills to answer the overarching question.
  • Looked at grade 4 example of critical inquiry unit.
  • Decided that our over arching question would be; Which natural resource is most endangers human existence?  Need to tweak this.
  • Overarching Critical Challenge: The UN has created a sustainability fund for natural resources. Create a proposal to convince them to fund your issue.  (Take the perspective of a representative of a specific country with a resource issue)
Next Steps:
  • Teachers will continue their observation/inferences lessons.  Focussing on making clearer, observations.  They will complete the lesson using new pictures.  Breaking images up into sections. 
  • Will try to think of more ideas to go towards the critical inquiry over arching question.



Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Grade Seven (French Immersion)

Focus- Integrating Critical Inquiry Throughout the Curriculum (Specifically Geography)

Attendance- Kevin, Danny, Stephen, Melissa, Mario, Brad, Rob

Overview
  • Started of by trying to solidify "If then" statement.  Agree that we need the diagnostic result to help us refine where we need to go.
  • Reviewed pictures selected by each member of the group to be used for 'Explaining the Image' lesson.
  • Went with picture of person digging rubble after a disaster.  Decided to use this because it would really separate the different between observations and inferences
  • Kevin and Melissa decided to co-teach the lesson the Kevin's  class.
  • Kevin introduced the lesson and the image.  Students engaged in quick dialogue about what was going on in the image.  He then introduced the 5Ws and discuss where they are commonly used. Melissa modeled how to do one of the five Ws (who) with the class and worked to clarify the difference between observations and inferences.  Kevin pulled out Success Criteria out of students  and posted at the front of the class.   Class given time to complete the other categories and come up with a summary explanation.
  • Since they were still completing this assignment.  Group met to debrief the lesson and discuss their observations and work worked/did not work.  
  • Continued discussion on the difference between Critical Inquiry, Critical Thinking and Critical Literacy.
  • Melissa provided a handout on Critical Inquiry for group to read for homework.
Next Steps:
  • After reading the article, each group member needs to come up with their own definition of what critical thinking, critical literacy and critical inquiry is.
  • Kevin and Stephen will bring completed Explain the Image assignments to next session for evaluation and discussion.

Grade 7 (French Immersion)

Focus- Integrating Critical Inquiry Throughout the Curriculum (Specifically Geography)

Attendance- Kevin, Danny, Stephen, Melissa, Mario, Brad, Rob

Overview
  •  Set boundaries for TFL process
  •  Goal is to create a permanent change in teacher practice
  •  Discussed why they wanted to look at critical inquiry and critical thinking
  •  Critical literacy was put forth and explored as another possibility
  •  Looked at evidence they have seen from their students to suggest this was where they should focus
  • Attempted to clarify difference between inquiry and critical thinking
  • Discussed that they wanted to use geography as the platform for teaching using an inquiry method.
  • Based on more discussion with regards to the language piece and time constraints in Geography, decided to integrate into Language Arts.
  • Decided we wanted a clearer understanding of where their greatest need was in this area. So we decided to create an opening task (diagnostic)
  • Melissa presented TC2 resource as a possible start point. 
  • Group selected "The Explain the Image" lesson
  • Reviewed the lesson.  Agreed to all bring in image for next week to base the lesson off.
Next Step:  Bring in image for the Explain the Image Lesson
                  Co-Teach lesson 
                  Analyze data

Monday, September 23, 2013

Welcome to TLF at Prince Philip

Welcome to this year's Teacher Facilitated Learning blog.  Over the course of the year, I will be posting what we work on each afternoon, along with handouts and another information that is pertinent to the learning that takes place.